Property Deeds Should Guarantee Safety for Senior Citizen Mother and father: Madras HC

In a big judgement, the Madras Excessive Court docket has dominated that property deeds should have a clause to maintain senior citizen mother and father. Which means that if senior citizen mother and father are bequeathing their property to their youngsters by the use of reward or as settlement, a clause needs to be included within the deed. The clause ought to state that the transferee will present primary and bodily must their mother and father. And if the transferee fails to supply or refuses primary facilities, the switch of property needs to be deemed to be made by fraud, coercion or undue affect, the HC says.


The Madurai Bench of the Madras Excessive Court docket handed this order whereas listening to a batch of petitions concerning cancellation of deeds, some filed by senior citizen mother and father.


The HC advised officers from the registration division to make sure that the situations stipulated in Part 23 of the Upkeep and Welfare of Mother and father and Senior Residents Act, 2007 are integrated in conveyance deeds. 


The court docket took severe notice of how after settlement of properties, a number of senior residents are thrown on the road. 


In accordance with the HC, Part 23 of the Act makes it clear that when the transferor, a senior citizen, conveyed the property by the use of reward or settlement, there needs to be a clause within the deed to make sure that the transferee supplied the fundamental and bodily must the transferor. 


Regardless of these provisions beneath the Act for prosecuting these abandoning senior residents, a number of of senior citizen mother and father discover themselves left within the lurch by youngsters as soon as they bequeath their properties. 


The court docket mentioned that the sub-registrar and registrar, who registers a deed of conveyance should be sure that the situations stipulated in Part 23 of the Act had been integrated within the deed, leaving the transferee not able to promote the property. In case of sale, the customer can be in danger.


Justice S Vaidyanathan famous that those that had been accountable for the care of senior residents however deserted them, needs to be imprisoned as per Part 24 of the Act, and imposition of wonderful was solely secondary. Though the phrase used is ‘both’ in Part 24 of the Act, the imprisonment needs to be made necessary.


The instances filed by senior residents must be heard on a day-to-day foundation with out adjournment for past seven working days.


He additional added that the officers must also be sure that when the kids attempt to promote the properties acquired from their mother and father, the signature of their mother and father (senior residents) is obtained. 


Justice Vaidyanathan mentioned in his order “Though the discretion is given to the Magistrates to attempt the offence and impose punishment, except the sword of Damocles is hanging on the kids, there can be numerous previous age properties mushrooming.”


The choose has additionally directed the registry of the court docket to put the matter earlier than the Chief Justice for structure of a bigger bench.

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *