Present Tax will in all probability be assessed on foundation of Guideline Worth for Valuation of Stamp Accountability and Registration: Madras Excessive Courtroom


Gift Tax- Stamp Duty- Madras High Court - taxscan

A two-judge bench of the Madras Excessive Courtroom has held that the rule of thumb worth for the intention of the valuation of stamp obligation and registration will in all probability be taken because the thought for the intention of figuring out the worth of the present as within the path of the worth as per Schedule II of Present Tax Act.

The assessee is a person. The division framed an evaluation beneath the Act for the evaluation yr 1991-92 on the underside that the taxable present exceeding Rs.12 lakhs has escaped evaluation in reference to a sale of the immovable property. The Assessing Officer well-known that the price quoted contained in the sale deed was not true or in a number of phrases, the property was disposed of for an insufficient consideration falling contained within the mischief of Half 4 of the Act. Accordingly, the evaluation was achieved on 31.03.1995 demanding a complete quantity of Rs.6,92,220/- as a present tax and thereafter, by order dated 13.08.1996 imposed a penalty of Rs.50,000/-.

On attraction, the Tribunal upheld the order of the Assessing Officer. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee approached the Excessive Courtroom for low cost.

Whereas upholding the order of the Tribunal, Justice T N Sivagnanam and Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup well-known that the assessee sought to depend on these paperwork to level that the rule of thumb worth was regularly been excessive and the market worth of the property was low.

The Courtroom held that “in any occasion, we aren’t on the valuation nonetheless we’re correct proper right here on the conduct of the assessee as to how he understood the considered valuation and we’re clear that the assessee was clear in his concepts as to how the valuation is required to be achieved. As a consequence of this actuality, to state at this juncture that the valuation has not been achieved within the case of Schedule II of the Present Tax Act is an argument that’s acknowledged to be rejected. That aside, after we check out the submissions made by the assessee prior to the CGT(A), an alternate submission was made stating that on and after 01.04.1987 after sub-section (2) was inserted in Half 3 of the Act, the tax will in all probability be on the price of 30% on the worth of all taxable devices and the Assessing Officer erroneously adopted the Schedule of costs given in Schedule I to the Act.”

“Thus the valuation of the property was achieved within the case of the provisions of the Present Tax Act and contained in the strategy of doing such analysis, the Assessing Officer relied upon the registered sale deeds and the stamp obligation which was paid on such devices although the plain sale consideration mirrored in these paperwork had been loads a lot much less. In any occasion, this being a query of actuality, the burden was on the assessee to level out that what he obtained was solely Rs.3 lakhs from the purchaser/partnership firm and not at all Rs.15,34,500/-. This aspect of the matter having not been established by the assessee, we uncover that the Tribunal rightly affirmed the orders handed by the authorities beneath. As far as the attraction with regard to the penalty is frightened, we uncover that ample low cost has been granted to the assessee by the Tribunal and we uncover that there’s nothing to intrude with such order,” the Courtroom acknowledged.

Subscribe Taxscan AdFree to view the Judgment

Help our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan AdFree. Alter to us on Telegram for fast updates.


Present hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *